mupwI':
Antares vertaHbogh vIHtaHghach'a' SuStel: I'm not fond of this; it looks like a very forced -ghach. How about just saying Antares mI'rab'a'
What do you mean by saying "a very forced -ghach" ? qunnoq On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:01 PM, nIqolay Q <niqolay0@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:46 PM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 8/9/2017 1:39 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
maj !
And finally, would you accept {pov Dung}, for the "area above is excellent" ?
Yes, with the caveat that if Hay typically requires a companion noun, maaaaaaaaybe the other "area" nouns do too, but I wouldn't hold anyone to it, including myself.
It might just be a semantic issue. Other locational nouns seem to either imply a direction or are used with an implied {naDev}, so something like {DungDaq} on its own could perhaps be used for "upwards, towards a general above-area" or "above here". But the notion of "beyond" doesn't really imply a direction, and it's defined relative to "here" so you'd need to reference a second point. With the right context you could probably get away with a lone {Hay}. {HayDaq ngem wIchIq} makes sense to me, for instance.
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org