25 Jul
2022
25 Jul
'22
6:29 a.m.
On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 18:55, D qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
So briefly, the analysis is not canon
Sadly, this disappoints me beyond words. I feel like I was about to drive a Ferrari, and now I'm being given a skateboard.
Why? Whether it's canon or not, the analysis contains useful information which can be verified against the text. If its statements are true, then they are facts about "canon", whether or not they are themselves "canonical". -- De'vID