22 Sep
2021
22 Sep
'21
1:53 p.m.
(st.k 11/1997): [{lo’laH}] is a simple verb in its own right (though it's an unusual two-syllable one), not the verb {lo'} “use” plus Type 5 suffix {-laH} “can”. It is likely that there is some sort of historical connection to the verb + suffix form, but, if so, it is just that -- historical. Voragh _______________________________________________________________ From: SuStel Oh, and don't forget lo'laH be valuable, which I believe Okrand said isn't necessarily just lo' + -laH. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/trimboli.name__;!!BpyFHLRN4TMTrA!rPRrcUoPSJNa4GLz7z1eDSpuq8nKTWR9Zb6BaGicKbWJ9fWKnq6qtEDrIrgv5XfWPPk$>