(st.k 11/1997):  [{lo’laH}] is a simple verb in its own right (though it's an unusual two-syllable one), not the verb {lo'}use” plus Type 5 suffix {-laH}can”.  It is likely that there is some sort of historical connection to the verb + suffix form, but, if so, it is just that -- historical.

Voragh

_______________________________________________________________

From: SuStel

Oh, and don't forget lo'laH be valuable, which I believe Okrand said isn't necessarily just lo' + -laH.

 

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name