That was my thinking too. If I were making a list: yuQ mI’ rav: vaghSaD mI’ rav: vaghSaD yuQ I’m thinking now of changing the word order in my subject heading to: Hovtay’ HurDaq vaghSaD rav yuQ woq NASA Voragh From: tlhIngan-Hol On Behalf Of De'vID On Thu., Mar. 24, 2022, 06:40 nIqolay Q, wrote: On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 3:51 PM Steven Boozer wrote: FYI: “NASA confirms more than 5,000 planets outside the solar system“ https://www.upi.com/Science_News/2022/03/22/NASA-exoplanets-planets-5000/9631647971189/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.upi.com/Science_News/2022/03/22/NASA-exoplanets-planets-5000/9631647971189/__;!!BpyFHLRN4TMTrA!pk1YeiKKBJHR2OpQ6K3u9g50DwIiiSm0GkN7VNceOWkwTLSFRxvU9yb_8u0rdersX-w$> [Can anyone think of a better way to say “at least 5,000”?] I know that the canonical example of {rav} and {'aqroS} to specify a range used them both, but I would be extremely surprised if {rav} couldn't be used on its own like this for "at least" (and correspondingly {'aqroS} for "at most"). I suppose if you wanted to adhere to strict canon usage, you could do {rav vaghSaD yuQ 'aqroS 'ejyaH yuQ}. There are canon examples of {rav} being used by itself to indicate a minimum: {Hung buv rav: patlh Hut} "Classified Level 9 and Above" (Bird of Prey poster) {nen rav: chorgh ben} "Ages 8 to adult" (Klingon Monopoly) -- De'vID