25 Oct
2019
25 Oct
'19
8:23 a.m.
De'vID:
The first is just a borrowing, and the second is not canon even if it's well- known in the community.
Even as a borrowing, since it's Ca'Non, I think it should be included too. As far as the {qabpaq} is concerned, I'm copying-pasting from my notes: "From an untranslated FaceBook post from Okrand to Andre (2/11/2014) discussing Burmese languages: Do'Ha' QIp qabpaqwIj. [bama/mIyanma] Hol mu'mey cha'be'. mI'mey neH cha'." Sadly, I haven't written in my notes, the date this message was sent in this list.. - bara'qa'