De'vID:

> The first is just a borrowing, and the

> second is not canon even if it's well-

> known in the community.

Even as a borrowing, since it's Ca'Non, I think it should be included too.

As far as the {qabpaq} is concerned, I'm copying-pasting from my notes:

"From an untranslated FaceBook post from Okrand to Andre (2/11/2014) discussing Burmese languages:

Do'Ha' QIp qabpaqwIj. [bama/mIyanma] Hol mu'mey cha'be'. mI'mey neH cha'."

Sadly, I haven't written in my notes, the date this message was sent in this list..

- bara'qa'