24 Aug
2021
24 Aug
'21
2:15 p.m.
On 8/24/2021 1:55 PM, Will Martin wrote:
Then there’s all those cases in canon of {tu’lu’} where {lutu’lu’} would be appropriate…
Possibly, but I think it's more likely that *tu'lu'* is a fixed expression. It's described separately in TKD and its very first use lacks a seemingly required *lu-.* Whether the fixed expression derives from *lutu'lu'* with a dropped *lu-* is unknown. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name