Then there’s all those cases in canon of {tu’lu’} where {lutu’lu’} would be appropriate…

Possibly, but I think it's more likely that tu'lu' is a fixed expression. It's described separately in TKD and its very first use lacks a seemingly required lu-. Whether the fixed expression derives from lutu'lu' with a dropped lu- is unknown.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name