On 11/16/2016 3:24 PM, David Holt wrote:
If you see me dancing up and down, you might conclude that
*puch vIlo'nIS*/I need to use the toilet./Going to the bathroom will
result in the benefit of not peeing in my pants, but no one is
requiring me to go. If you're my boss and you tell me *puch yIlo'*
/use the toilet!/I can now truthfully say *puch vIlo' net poQ*/I am/
/required to use the bathroom,/because you are the outside
agency making the demand, and it's my job to do what you say,
regardless of the state of or danger to my pants. I can also
continue to say*puch vIlo'nIS,*because my own personal need
has not disappeared, but it says nothing about your demand.
I still don't get it. What's the difference between the agency of the boss and the agency of the bladder?
Wait, there's one last element: /need/ implies a kind of personal urgency; /must/ or /have to/ has less of such a sense; any urgency is imposed from outside. Really, there's a ton about this easily found: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=difference+between+need+and+must -- SuStel http://trimboli.name