DaH naDev jIHtaHbogh meq Saja' qamchIyDaq 'uQ'a' naDev may mean:- - N:[here|hereabouts] jIHtaHbogh may mean:- - V:monitor* VS7:continuous VS9:which_rel - P:[I|me] VS7:continuous VS9:which_rel - P:[I|me] V:[continue*|go_on*|endure*|survive=|be_at_negative_angle] VS9:which_rel meq may mean:- - V:reason - N:[motive=|reason] Saja' may mean:- - PP:I/you_pl V:[tell|report] "I tell you why I am here." qamchIyDaq may mean:- 'uQ'a' may mean:- "Banquet at qamchIy" - N:[banquet|feast]= - N:dinner NS1:augmentative ----Original message----
From : netzakh@yahoo.com Date : 30/08/2017 - 23:34 (GMTST) To : tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org Subject : [tlhIngan Hol] -meH meq, and paq'batlh I would add that there is a sentence in paq'batlh: DaH naDev jIHtaHbogh meq Saja' (interestingly, in {qamchIyDaq 'uQ'a'}) Before the qep'a', I suggested (apparently, on FB) that Maltz comments on the grammar of this sentence; hopefully, more light will be shed at the upcoming qepHom'a'. I am also quite interested in which nouns can serve as head nouns of a {-bogh} clause when the clause relates to its own entirety rather than to its subject or object (poH? ngoD/ghu'? Daq? nger/qech?).