DaH naDev jIHtaHbogh meq Saja'

qamchIyDaq 'uQ'a'

naDev may mean:-
- N:[here|hereabouts]
jIHtaHbogh may mean:-
- V:monitor* VS7:continuous VS9:which_rel
- P:[I|me] VS7:continuous VS9:which_rel
- P:[I|me] V:[continue*|go_on*|endure*|survive=|be_at_negative_angle] VS9:which_rel
meq may mean:-
- V:reason
- N:[motive=|reason]
Saja' may mean:-
- PP:I/you_pl V:[tell|report]

"I tell you why I am here."

qamchIyDaq may mean:-
'uQ'a' may mean:-

"Banquet at qamchIy"

- N:[banquet|feast]=
- N:dinner NS1:augmentative

----Original message----
From : netzakh@yahoo.com
Date : 30/08/2017 - 23:34 (GMTST)
To : tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
Subject : [tlhIngan Hol] -meH meq, and paq'batlh

I would add that there is a sentence in paq'batlh:

DaH naDev jIHtaHbogh meq Saja'

(interestingly, in {qamchIyDaq 'uQ'a'})

Before the qep'a', I suggested (apparently, on FB) that Maltz comments on the grammar of this sentence; hopefully, more light will be shed at the upcoming qepHom'a'.

I am also quite interested in which nouns can serve as head nouns of a {-bogh} clause when the clause relates to its own entirety rather than to its subject or object (poH? ngoD/ghu'? Daq? nger/qech?).