De'vID:
If I don't include the Klingon dialogue searchable by the translated subtitles from DSC, I expect to get dozens of emails asking me why those sentences are missing.
You could just write at the play google store, that boQwI' includes only okrandian canon. Or create a section at boQwI', where non-okrandian sentences are grouped together. As someone who wouldn't have learned klingon if it wasn't for boQwI', I have to say that I wouldn't like seeing side by side, okrand and not-okrand sentences. Let alone that an additional problem will possibly arise: If you do include DSC non-okrand sentences for beginners, then these are the same beginners who will be confused, if and when okrand disqualifies something written in those sentences. qunnoq On 11 Aug 2017 4:25 pm, "nIqolay Q" <niqolay0@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:22 AM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps I asked the wrong question. I don't necessarily consider Klingon from DSC to be Okrandian canonical Klingon until Okrand retroactively blesses it, but I'm going to (unless someone persuades me otherwise) include them in {boQwI'} anyway before he does so. I suppose the question really is, does anyone have a serious objection to {boQwI'} containing both Okrandian canon and good Klingon which conforms to Okrandian Klingon but which isn't from Okrand? Such entries will of course be marked as having come from DSC. <http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org>
It already does, though. The entry for {taH pagh taHbe'} contains the whole translation of the soliloquy; has anyone ever complained about that?
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org