On 1/23/2018 7:53 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
There is something, which I'm wondering with regards to the {-Daq}.
Unfortunately though, in order to describe it, I need to write a ridiculous example.
Assume I want to say, "I give DuraS the middle finger".
Initially, it came to me to write: {DuraSDaq qaywI' vI'agh}.
However, this phrase gives me the impression that someone has mounted DuraS, and there -on DuraS-, he displays the middle finger.
So, I'm wondering whether this assumption is correct. Or could {-Daq} indeed be used to convey the intended meaning ?
I *feel* that it is more appropriate to say {DuraSvaD qaywI' vI'agh}.
Although since I'm not certain, if anyone could shed some light on the matter, it would be great.
*DuraSvaD qaywI' vI'agh* is correct, because *DuraS* is the indirect object of the sentence. It would also be correct to say *DuraSDaq jIqay.* -- SuStel http://trimboli.name