On 1/23/2018 7:53 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
There is something, which I'm wondering with regards to the {-Daq}.

Unfortunately though, in order to describe it, I need to write a ridiculous example.

Assume I want to say, "I give DuraS the middle finger".

Initially, it came to me to write: {DuraSDaq qaywI' vI'agh}.

However, this phrase gives me the impression that someone has mounted DuraS, and there -on DuraS-, he displays the middle finger.

So, I'm wondering whether this assumption is correct. Or could {-Daq} indeed be used to convey the intended meaning ?

I *feel* that it is more appropriate to say {DuraSvaD qaywI' vI'agh}.

Although since I'm not certain, if anyone could shed some light on the matter, it would be great.

DuraSvaD qaywI' vI'agh is correct, because DuraS is the indirect object of the sentence.

It would also be correct to say DuraSDaq jIqay.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name