On 7/24/2019 8:24 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
If we say {juHvamvo' jIHaw'}, the "getting out" carries a sense of urgency.
But lets see it in reverse. Can I say {jIHaw'} without the "I flee", carrying with it a sense of "getting out" ?
And to say an example..
There is a person in the middle of the desert. He's not in a house/tent/oasis whatever.
A second person arrives, and causes the first one to flee, but this first person doesn't leave the desert. He flees to another location, which is still in the same desert.
Can we say {nuv cha'DIchmo' Haw'pu' nuv wa'DIch} ?
Or since the first person, didn't get out of a place, we can't use {Haw'} ?
Fleeing, and *Haw',* aren't about going into or out of any particular place. They're about withdrawing from some situation. *nuv cha'DIchmo' Haw'pu' nuv wa'DIch*/The first person fled because of the second person. /*nuv cha'DIchvo' Haw'pu' nuv wa'DIch*/The first person fled from the second person. /*Qobvo' Haw'pu' nuv wa'DIch*/The first person fled from danger./ //*latlh Deb DaqDaq Haw'pu' nuv wa'DIch*/The first person fled to another desert location./ -- SuStel http://trimboli.name