On 3/24/2019 8:40 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
jIH:
I find defiance of ca'non disturbing SuStel: bIvoqbe'mo' vISujlu'.
Interesting.. But let me ask you. What is your opinion, with regards to the following:
bIvoqbe', 'ej muSuj you don't believe, and it (this fact) disturbs me
Do you see any problem, with the subject of {Suj} being the implied and unstated fact of "not believing" ?
It's not ungrammatical to elide an *'oH* which refers to *ngoDvam.* However, you never established the antecedent in the first place. What you're really doing is *bIvoqbe' 'ej muSuj 'e'.* This is, of course, not allowed. Another way to translate the line would be *muSuj voqbe'ghachlIj.* Actually, I like this better than my first one. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name