jIH:

> I find defiance of ca'non disturbing
SuStel:

> bIvoqbe'mo' vISujlu'.

Interesting.. But let me ask you. What is your opinion, with regards to the following:

bIvoqbe', 'ej muSuj

you don't believe, and it (this fact) disturbs me

Do you see any problem, with the subject of {Suj} being the implied and unstated fact of "not believing" ?

It's not ungrammatical to elide an 'oH which refers to ngoDvam. However, you never established the antecedent in the first place.

What you're really doing is bIvoqbe' 'ej muSuj 'e'. This is, of course, not allowed.

Another way to translate the line would be muSuj voqbe'ghachlIj. Actually, I like this better than my first one.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name