I’ve always used {vaj} for conditional {-chugh} statements. There are many possible cases. If X is the case, {vaj} Y. I’d more simply say {jIghungpu’mo’ pItSa vIvun.} That doesn’t make me right and you wrong. I’m just offering a perspective to consider. bIghungchugh vaj pItSa DavunlaH. charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.
On Oct 6, 2020, at 9:38 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
{vaj} {meqvammo'} bopbogh vay''e' vIyajbe'.
vaj = so, then, thus, in that case meqvammo' = because of this reason
jIjatlh vIneH: "I was hungry so I ordered a pizza".
jIghungpu'; vaj pItSa' vIvunpu' jIghungpu'; meqvammo' pItSa' vIvunpu'.
chay' pIm cha' mu'tlheghvam ?
~ Qa'yIn _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org