I’ve always used {vaj} for conditional {-chugh} statements. There are many possible cases. If X is the case, {vaj} Y.

I’d more simply say {jIghungpu’mo’ pItSa vIvun.}

That doesn’t make me right and you wrong. I’m just offering a perspective to consider.

bIghungchugh vaj pItSa DavunlaH.

charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan

rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.

On Oct 6, 2020, at 9:38 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:

{vaj} {meqvammo'} bopbogh vay''e' vIyajbe'.

vaj = so, then, thus, in that case
meqvammo' = because of this reason

jIjatlh vIneH: "I was hungry so I ordered a pizza".

jIghungpu'; vaj pItSa' vIvunpu'
jIghungpu'; meqvammo' pItSa' vIvunpu'.

chay' pIm cha' mu'tlheghvam ?

~ Qa'yIn
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org