Actually, Jeremy, I think you were on to something. {patlh} with a plural subject merely means "they are ranked," but adding {jaSHa'} you get "they are ranked similarly." Given the right context this might also be translated "they compare" or "they are comparable." {jaS patlh} by the same token could be translated as "they are not comparable." (I also just noticed that {jaS} or {jaSHa'} in these cases could refer either to the outcome implied by {patlh} or the process of becoming {patlh}.) ~mIp'av On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 7:21 AM, David Holt <kenjutsuka@live.com> wrote:
DopDaq qul yIchenmoH QobDI' ghu'
Yeah. Never mind. I had just woken up and I guess my brain wasn't working right. It makes complete sense for the OBJECT of {patlhmoH} to be plural with the intent of comparing them. But for some reason my brain read that the SUBJECTS were being compared and that didn't make any sense at all. I'm a little more awake now and reading words correctly again.
Jeremy
------------------------------ *From:* tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org> on behalf of De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> *Sent:* Friday, February 16, 2018 5:42 AM *To:* tlhIngan-Hol *Subject:* Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Maltz about to compare
On 16 February 2018 at 12:35, David Holt <kenjutsuka@live.com> wrote:
Is he saying {patlh} can also mean "compare" or {patlhmoH} can mean "compare"? The statement about "compare" comes right after {patlhmoH}, but it seems odd syntactically and it seems odd to say "of course, the object of the verb is plural."
However, I could easily see {patlh} with a plural subject to mean, "they compare". Could you clarify?
It seems pretty clear that he's saying {patlhmoH} means "compare" with the things to be compared listed as the object.
-- De'vID
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org