[tlhIngan Hol] ghelwI'
SuStel
sustel at trimboli.name
Tue Sep 5 07:14:18 PDT 2017
On 9/5/2017 9:04 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
> and I ask again..
>
> "..However, if one of the meanings given by the {-wI'} is "thing which
> does/is", then why not translate {ghelwI'} as "thing which
> asks"/"thing which is asking" i.e. a question ?.."
It has been pointed out to you that *ghelwI'* might indeed be translated
as the question itself, in the same way that a *ghItlhwI'* might be a
person writing or a pen writing. However, this is assuming that a
question is a thing that can /ask./ One might say a question is nothing
but an utterance that conveys the asking of a person. The question is
not asking a question. We don't know how Klingons view this linguistically.
When you used it in another thread, I understood what you were saying,
but that's not the same as saying it's the right way to say it. In a
neutral context, I'd be much more inclined to assume a *ghelwI'* is a
person or device asking a question than the question itself. Since you
can easily avoid the problem by not trying to turn /question/ into a
Klingon noun (/I have a question/ --> *jIghelnIS*), it's best to chalk
this up to "we don't know" and leave it at that.
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170905/71afc05f/attachment-0017.htm>
More information about the tlhIngan-Hol
mailing list