[tlhIngan Hol] Imperatives and {-be'}
SuStel
sustel at trimboli.name
Thu Jul 6 08:28:24 PDT 2017
On 7/6/2017 11:14 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
> Apologising once more in advance for quoting boQwI', I need to bring
> this up, because there I read that..
>
> "Even though tkd says that {-be'} cannot be used with imperatives, it
> seems that this means only that it cannot be used to form negative
> imperatives. For example, a sentence such as {HIleghbe'moH} seems to
> be possible"
>
> I can't understand this. Isn't the {HIleghbe'moH} a negative
> imperative ? Doesn't it mean "make me not see !" ?
boQwI' is wrong. I don't know how the creator came to that conclusion.
It would be convenient if we could, but TKD prohibits it and I don't
think we've ever seen a counterexample.
Without that convenience, we have to say things like *jIleghbe' 'e'
yIqaSmoH*/cause me not seeing to occur!/ or be more direct: *mInwIj
tIvel*/cover my eyes!/ or *pa' yIHurghmoH*/make the room dark!/
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170706/cc168042/attachment-0016.htm>
More information about the tlhIngan-Hol
mailing list