<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/6/2017 11:14 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cLM-t2oztSQfaz5EdK9ZkfCAjMUdqbfdVDb00os36-gXg@mail.gmail.com">Apologising
once more in advance for quoting boQwI', I need to bring this up,
because there I read that..
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">"Even though tkd says that {-be'} cannot be used
with imperatives, it seems that this means only that it cannot
be used to form negative imperatives. For example, a sentence
such as {HIleghbe'moH} seems to be possible"</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I can't understand this. Isn't the {HIleghbe'moH}
a negative imperative ? Doesn't it mean "make me not see !" ?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>boQwI' is wrong. I don't know how the creator came to that
conclusion. It would be convenient if we could, but TKD prohibits
it and I don't think we've ever seen a counterexample.</p>
<p>Without that convenience, we have to say things like <b>jIleghbe'
'e' yIqaSmoH</b><i> cause me not seeing to occur!</i> or be more
direct: <b>mInwIj tIvel</b><i> cover my eyes!</i> or <b>pa'
yIHurghmoH</b><i> make the room dark!</i><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>