[tlhIngan Hol] neH after nouns with type 5 suffixes

[mayqel qunenoS]

> Dung qo' pawDI' qeylIS qorDu' je ta''e' neH bop bommey.
> Upon reaching the upper world, no one could speak of anything, but
> the deeds of Kahless and his kin.  (PB)

I can't say I understand the addition of {-'e'} on the {ta'}. Because
of the {neH}, the meaning is already clear: "no one could speak of
*anything but* the deeds". Why add {-'e'} on the {ta'} ? To emphasize
the word deeds ? The translation doesn't emphasize the "deeds"; it
emphasizes the "anything but".

qunnoq

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Steven Boozer <sboozer at uchicago.edu> wrote:
> muDDaq neH muD Dujmey vorgh lu'orlu', 'ach loghDaq puvlaH Dujmey
>    'orbogh nuv 'e' 'agh X-wa'maH vagh.
> [translation not available]  (NASM: X-15)
>
> Dung qo' pawDI' qeylIS qorDu' je ta''e' neH bop bommey.
> Upon reaching the upper world, no one could speak of anything, but
>   the deeds of Kahless and his kin.  (PB)
>
> --Voragh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> On Behalf Of De'vID
>
> On 7 August 2017 at 15:22, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
>> On 8/7/2017 8:25 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we have {neH} after nouns with type 5 suffixes ?
>>>
>>> For example:
>>>
>>> juHlIjDaq neH pegh vI'aghlaH
>>> Only at your house I'm able to reveal the secret
>>
>>
>> I don't see why not, though I can't think of any canonical examples.
>
> not qoHpu''e' neH ghIjlu'.
>
> --
> De'vID
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org