[tlhIngan Hol] neH after nouns with type 5 suffixes
Steven Boozer
sboozer at uchicago.edu
Mon Aug 7 06:53:18 PDT 2017
muDDaq neH muD Dujmey vorgh lu'orlu', 'ach loghDaq puvlaH Dujmey
'orbogh nuv 'e' 'agh X-wa'maH vagh.
[translation not available] (NASM: X-15)
Dung qo' pawDI' qeylIS qorDu' je ta''e' neH bop bommey.
Upon reaching the upper world, no one could speak of anything, but
the deeds of Kahless and his kin. (PB)
--Voragh
-----Original Message-----
On Behalf Of De'vID
On 7 August 2017 at 15:22, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
> On 8/7/2017 8:25 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>>
>> Can we have {neH} after nouns with type 5 suffixes ?
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> juHlIjDaq neH pegh vI'aghlaH
>> Only at your house I'm able to reveal the secret
>
>
> I don't see why not, though I can't think of any canonical examples.
not qoHpu''e' neH ghIjlu'.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
More information about the tlhIngan-Hol
mailing list