[tlhIngan Hol] And because of this reason cars should have phasers

[SuStel]

On 11/9/2016 10:43 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>
> > wanI'vam lajlu'Qo
>
> I wrote this in order to say "someone refuses to accept this event".
>
> Could I write instead {wanI'vam lajQo' wa'} ? Can the {wa'}, "stand 
> alone" in order to mean "one person/someone" ?
>

Yes. See /TKD /5.2: "Numbers are used as nouns. As such, they may stand 
alone as subjects or objects or they may modify another noun." But based 
on /TKD/, *wanI'vam lajQo' wa'* probably means /one (of them) won't 
accept this event/—in other words, it presupposes the listener already 
knows about a group, out of which you're singling one. It's not the same 
as *vay'* or *-lu'*.

I think *wanI'vam lajlu'Qo'* is the superior sentence, and better 
translated /this event won't be accepted./

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161109/9a6cb6c6/attachment-0017.htm>