[tlhIngan Hol] Admire the man..

mayqel qunenoS mihkoun at gmail.com
Fri Jun 24 08:19:33 PDT 2016

Thank you so much for telling me !

This incident reminds me of my {-chugh} misunderstanding, when I
started writing in klingon ;

Then I believed, that the {-chugh} can be used in a similar way to the
english "whether". Luckily -way back then- De'vID had written "if in
an english sentence, the "if" can be replaced with "whether" and still
make sense, then that sentence can't use the klingon {-chugh}". Or
something like this..

Anyway, I'm happy I finally learned this important information, which
concerns the proper use of {-vaD}.

mop Hurgh qunnoq

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:06 PM, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
> On 6/24/2016 11:05 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>> Perhaps now I'm beginning to understand my problem.
>> In klingon the {-vaD} can ONLY be used as a beneficiary-for, and NOT
>> as a purpose-for, right ? Is this where my mistake actually lies ?
>> That I'm using the {-vaD} as a purpose-for instead of a
>> beneficiary-for ?
> I think that is the case, yes.
> --
> SuStel
> http://trimboli.name
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list