[tlhIngan Hol] Admire the man..

[SuStel]

On 6/24/2016 11:05 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
> Perhaps now I'm beginning to understand my problem.
>
> In klingon the {-vaD} can ONLY be used as a beneficiary-for, and NOT
> as a purpose-for, right ? Is this where my mistake actually lies ?
> That I'm using the {-vaD} as a purpose-for instead of a
> beneficiary-for ?

I think that is the case, yes.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name