“A rogue planet is floating through our galaxy“ https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/rogue-planet-galax... I had previously coined the term *{lengbogh yuQ} for a rogue planet but instead went with {rIjHa’} “be adrift” as I didn’t want to use {leng} twice in the same sentence. Also, our two known verbs for “float” -- {‘al} “float (in/on air)” and {‘ay} “float (in/on water or other liquids) -- don’t fit floating in vacuum, so again I opted for {leng} “which is travel with or without a special purpose” (Lieven 11/11/2013). -- Voragh Ca'Non Master of the Klingons
Am 29.10.2020 um 21:51 schrieb Steven Boozer:
I had previously coined the term *{lengbogh yuQ} for a rogue planet but instead went with {rIjHa’} “be adrift” as I didn’t want to use {leng} twice in the same sentence. Also, our two known verbs for “float” -- {‘al} “float (in/on air)” and {‘ay} “float (in/on water or other liquids) -- don’t fit floating in vacuum, so again I opted for {leng} “which is travel with or without a special purpose” (Lieven 11/11/2013).
Are you sure this came from me? First, could you please tell me in what context I wrote that? I don't remember that. Next, the word {rIjHa'} appeared in 2018, the above message is dated 2013. Something is wrong here. -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" http://www.tlhInganHol.com http://klingon.wiki/Word/RIjHa-
According to my notes the comment comes from the qepHom 2013 booklet: ve' travel with a purpose or for a specific reason, travel on a mission (v) (qepHom 2013 < STID) - {jIvuylaH. jIve'.} I am here to help you. (STID) - "Opposed to {leng}, which is travel with or without a special purpose." (qepHom 2013 booklet, 11/2013) {rIj} "be moored, anchored" and {rIjHa'} "be adrift" - both revealed at qep'a' 2018 - have nothing to do with {leng}. I was just playing with ways to render "rogue planet". Voragh -----Original Message----------Original Message----------Original Message----- From: Lieven L. Litaer Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 2:06 AM Am 29.10.2020 um 21:51 schrieb Steven Boozer:
I had previously coined the term *{lengbogh yuQ} for a rogue planet but instead went with {rIjHa’} “be adrift” as I didn’t want to use {leng} twice in the same sentence. Also, our two known verbs for “float” -- {‘al} “float (in/on air)” and {‘ay} “float (in/on water or other liquids) -- don’t fit floating in vacuum, so again I opted for {leng} “which is travel with or without a special purpose” (Lieven 11/11/2013).
Are you sure this came from me? First, could you please tell me in what context I wrote that? I don't remember that. Next, the word {rIjHa'} appeared in 2018, the above message is dated 2013. Something is wrong here. -- Lieven L. Litaer
participants (2)
-
Lieven L. Litaer -
Steven Boozer