{-vaD} and {-moH} combination as a {-bogh} clause
jIqon: yaS luHoHpu' Ha'DIbaHmeyvaD mo' vI'elmoHpu'bogh. the officer was killed by the animals which I caused to enter the cage. Ha'DIbaHmeyvaD mo' lu'elmoHpu'bogh DIlegh. we see the animals which they caused to enter the cage. lugh'a' mu'tlheghmeyvam? ~ Dana'an
On 5/18/2021 8:25 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
yaS luHoHpu' Ha'DIbaHmeyvaD mo' vI'elmoHpu'bogh. the officer was killed by the animals which I caused to enter the cage.
Ha'DIbaHmeyvaD mo' lu'elmoHpu'bogh DIlegh. we see the animals which they caused to enter the cage.
lugh'a' mu'tlheghmeyvam?
No. These are examples of the /ship in which I fled/ problem. Okrand said that he couldn't find a way to make the head noun of a relative clause anything other than the subject or object of the clause. We take that to mean it's not allowed. His solution was to recast into multiple sentences. http://klingonska.org/canon/1995-06-holqed-04-2-a.txt *Ha'DIbaHmeyvamvaD mo' vI'elmoHpu'. yaS luHoHpu' bIH. */I made these animals enter the cage. They killed the officer./ *Ha'DIbaHmeyvaD mo' lu'elmoHpu' chaH. bIH DIlegh. */They (people) made the animals enter the cage. We see them (the animals)./ -- SuStel http://trimboli.name
participants (2)
-
mayqel qunen'oS -
SuStel