using an entire sao as a {-bogh} phrase
This isn't something I'd actually do, but I'm wondering whether it would be actually correct. I want to say "the officer who wants us to defect is a traitor". Or "the officer who plans that we defect is a traitor". So I write: maghwI' ghaH macheH neHbogh yaS'e' maghwI' ghaH macheH 'e' nabbogh yaS'e' Are the above correct? -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ
On 4/20/2022 8:28 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
This isn't something I'd actually do, but I'm wondering whether it would be actually correct.
I want to say "the officer who wants us to defect is a traitor". Or "the officer who plans that we defect is a traitor". So I write:
maghwI' ghaH macheH neHbogh yaS'e' maghwI' ghaH macheH 'e' nabbogh yaS'e'
Are the above correct?
Yes, they're correct, and we have at least one canonical example of this sort of thing: veqlarghvo' narghbogh loD chutDaj bIv 'e' ngIlbogh loD DaH pongDaj Sov qotar Now Kotar has the name Of the one who eluded Fek'lhr, And he dared to defy his rules. (paq'batlh) -- SuStel http://trimboli.name
participants (2)
-
mayqel qunen'oS -
SuStel