nuq 'oH wa' Degh'e'? vay' renlu'pu'bogh neH 'oH'a'? pagh pIlmoHlaH je? pagh DI'ruj'e' jembogh nuv choHlaH'a' je? pagh nuv yIn Hoch SIghlaH'a' je Degh mIt? 'ej < ghobe' > jangchugh vay', chaq qelnIS nuvvam: poHmey tIQ, che'ronDaq mangpu'chaj pIlchoHmoHmeH 'ej yoHchoHmoHmeH wo'mey, Deghmey le' lo'pu'. napbe' Degh Soj. SaD law'qu' mu' chIwlaHbej wa' Degh neH. 'ej vabDot Degh Soj luQIjlaHbe' SaD law' mu'. -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ
ghunchu'wI':
napqu' qech 'oSbogh veS Degh. vIQImeH yap wa' mu': maH'e'
bIlugh, 'ej jIQochbe'. -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ
jIH:
renlu'pu'bogh neH 'oH'a'? pagh pIlmoHlaH je? pagh DI'ruj'e' jembogh nuv choHlaH'a' je? pagh nuv yIn Hoch SIghlaH'a' je Degh mIt?
I don't like the way I wrote this. First of all I obviously forgot the interrogative {-'a'} on the {pIlmoHlaH}, let alone the fact that although I meant the {pagh} as "or", rereading this I got confused wondering for a moment whether I meant it as "no one"/"zero". I could just write all this without the {pagh} like this: {vay' renlu'pu'bogh neH 'oH'a'? pIlmoHlaH'a' je? DI'ruj'e' jembogh nuv choHlaH'a' je? nuv yIn Hoch SIghlaH'a' je Degh mIt?} "Is it just something which someone designed? Is it able to inspire too? Is it able to change the reality which is perceived by a person? Is the appropriate symbol able to influence the entire life of a person?" I think it's better this way. -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ
participants (2)
-
ghunchu'wI' 'utlh -
mayqel qunen'oS