> renlu'pu'bogh neH 'oH'a'? pagh pIlmoHlaH

> je? pagh DI'ruj'e' jembogh nuv choHlaH'a'

> je? pagh nuv yIn Hoch SIghlaH'a' je Degh

> mIt?

I don't like the way I wrote this.

First of all I obviously forgot the interrogative {-'a'} on the {pIlmoHlaH}, let alone the fact that although I meant the {pagh} as "or", rereading this I got confused wondering for a moment whether I meant it as "no one"/"zero".

I could just write all this without the {pagh} like this:

{vay' renlu'pu'bogh neH 'oH'a'? pIlmoHlaH'a' je? DI'ruj'e' jembogh nuv choHlaH'a' je? nuv yIn Hoch SIghlaH'a' je Degh mIt?}

"Is it just something which someone designed? Is it able to inspire too? Is it able to change the reality which is perceived by a person? Is the appropriate symbol able to influence the entire life of a person?"

I think it's better this way.