26 Apr
2022
26 Apr
'22
7:27 a.m.
On 4/26/2022 8:13 AM, D qunen'oS wrote:
muSIghbe' nepbogh 'ej tojmeH mu'meylIj your lying and deceiving words don't deceive me
Would that be correct? Could we create a noun which is both {-meH}'ed and {-bogh}'ed?
You can make a noun that participates in both a relative cause and a purpose clause, but I don't believe you can *'ej* them. You can't say, for instance, *nepbogh 'ej tojmeH* /which lies and for deceiving./ You CAN say *nepbogh tojmeH mu'meylIj* /your words for deceiving which lie./ But why would you want to say it this way? Why not say *nepbogh mu'meylIj 'ej tojbogh* /your words which lie and which deceive?/ -- SuStel http://trimboli.name