On 11 August 2017 at 01:54, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
I left it out for exactly the reason I stated: you don't need it to see what the role of X-Daq Y-vo' V seems to be when X is of a greater scope than Y. I wasn't continuing to describe your scenario.
This was the point I was trying to make with my sentences, which in retrospect were more complicated than necessary to illustrate the point. {vaS'a'vo' tera'Daq chegh} "he/she returns from the Great Hall to Earth" {tera'Daq vaS'a'vo' chegh} does this mean "on Earth, he/she returns from the Great Hall" or "he/she returns to Earth from the Great Hall"? The latter feels like it's saying that {vaS'a'} is located on Earth. WIth {X-vo' Y-Daq chegh}, this ambiguity does not exist. -- De'vID