indeed.. while I was writing this, I knew that it would come down to "because maltz said so". but I just can't see the logic of this rule. qunnoH jan puqloD SuvwI'pu'qoq Hol tughojmoHta'mo' Satlho' On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
TKD 43: This suffix [{-vIS}] is always used along with the Type 7 suffix {-taH} “continuous".
Just consider it one of Okrand’s “just because” rules. We could argue the whys and wherefores to death – and we often do! – but, in the end, we just have to accept it and move on.
In fact, I could only find only one example of {-vIS} and {-lI’} even occurring in the same sentence, albeit on different verbs:
ghobe' ! qarbejbogh DoDvam qontaH 'u'
jevqu'taHvIS muD ral, bejlI' parmaq.
Oh, no ! It [love] is an ever-fixed mark.
That looks on tempests and is never shaken. (Sonnet 116)
--Voragh
On Behalf Of mayqel qunenoS
I can't understand why the {-lIvIS} is illegal. Can't I be doing something, while something is proceeding towards a known goal or stopping point ?
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org