you know.. there are some things in klingon which do make sense, and I understand their necessity. on the other hand, there are others which I can't understand why they have to be this way ; why would it hurt to actually have QAO ? why would it hurt to have an aspect suffix after the {'e'} in a SAO ? why {lu'} and {laH}, or {qa'} and {choH}, are mutually exclusive ? can't "someone" be "able to" at the same time ? or can't I "start" doing something "again" ? but as in life there are no answers to the questions that really matter (why are we born, what happens after death etc), in tlhIngan Hol too, there are no answers to the questions that really matter either.. yan Doq qunnoq On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
Am 13.07.2016 um 14:44 schrieb mayqel qunenoS:
but this is right ?
[chay' veSDuj'a' vIghajlaH?] - DaH 'e' boyajchoH
No, since Klingon is a spoken language, punctuation does not change anything in the meaning. It's still wrong.
-- Lieven L. Litaer aka Quvar valer 'utlh Grammarian of the KLI http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher http://www.klingonwiki.net _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org