29 Jul
2020
29 Jul
'20
11:15 a.m.
On Jul 29, 2020, at 7:38 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
Does this kind of historical connection mean that we can't use the suffix -laH on the {lo'laH} ?
Regardless of its supposed etymology, {lo'laH} is a verb in its own right. Grammatically, it should accept suffixes just like any verb. The second syllable might have been a suffix at one time, but it’s just part of the word now. I suggest that {QongDaqDaq} is a relevant example. -- ghunchu'wI'