4 Dec
2016
4 Dec
'16
11:50 a.m.
On 12/4/2016 11:44 AM, Alan Anderson wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 8:29 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com <mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com>> wrote:
At the BoP poster we have {telDaq wovmoHwI'} for "wing light".
Doesn't this violate the rule that in a noun-noun construction only the last can have type-5 suffixes ?
It does, if you consider {telDaq} to have a Type 5 noun suffix.
It does not, if you consider it to be a compound {tel} "wing" + {Daq} "location", making the phrase "wing-location brightener".
But then it really behooves you to explain why Okrand didn't just go with *tel wovmoHwI'.* -- SuStel http://trimboli.name