SuStel:
Only the first one is acceptable as a standalone sentence
Actually here is my problem. I can't understand *why* they can't be used as standalone sentences. Allow me to explain how I understand each of these sentences. {jImIp net jalchugh, vaj vIghro' tIQ vIje'} "If I was rich, I would buy an ancient cat" i.e., in case I was rich, at that reality, I would buy the ancient cat. {jImIp net jalchugh, ngugh vIghro' tIQ vIje' } "If I was rich, at that time I would buy an ancient cat" i.e., "if I was rich in a specific point in time, I would buy the cat at that specific point of time". {jImIp net jalchugh, ghIq vIghro' tIQ vIje'} "If I was rich, subsequently I would buy an ancient cat" i.e., "If I was rich at a specific point in time, after that specific point, meaning after I had become rich, I would buy the cat" Could you tell me your opinion on all this ? Of course, to avoid misunderstandings, which would lead to the hate starting again to flow through some people, I want to clarify that I'm not saying that I'm right. On the contrary, I know that I'm missing something here, and I'm trying to understand what this something actually is.. ~ m. qunen'oS though shalt have no other Ca'Non before me