Re: [tlhIngan Hol] To -choH, to -'eghmoH, or to nothing ?

On 3/4/2019 1:07 PM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:

Have we ever seen in Ca'NoN imperatives without -choH, and without -'eghmoH ? e.g. yItam, yIjot, yIQong, etc ?

*yIn nI' yISIQ 'ej yIchep */Live long and prosper./ (http://klingonska.org/canon/1996-08-rt.txt) *Dujeychugh jagh nIv yItuHQo' */There is nothing shameful in falling before a superior enemy./ (TKW) *QaghmeylIj tIchID, yIyoH */Have the courage to admit your mistakes. /(TKW) I haven't looked for more. By the way, *yIQong* should not be on that list, as it's not a verb of quality. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name