SuStel:
This is an old question. I think the combination is meaningless. If it meant anything at all, it would probably be action taken by someone unspecified, but I don't think it really means that.
ok thanks. This whole matter *feels* to me like, combining {-lu'} with {-wI'}, thus writing something like {leghlu'wI'}, which I don't *feel* as something actually making sense. (but I may be wrong, and if I am, please do correct me..) jevreH:
My intuition is someone was just trying to get around the prohibition against using -ghach on suffixless verbs by tossing -lu‘ on there since it wouldn’t really change the meaning.
Yeah.. I thought of this too, while initially reading the {vanglu'ghach}. Seeing it, reminded me of the "grammarian's desk", where krankor wrote (if I remember correctly) that one could use the combination of {-neS} with {-ghach}, as a way to get around the prohibition of using {-ghach} on suffixless verbs. Although, I never actually bought that argument.. I didn't feel it actually making sense. ~ mayqel qunen'oS