We know that the {-vaD}, is to be used only for the purpose of marking the beneficiary/indirect object. When we had discussed the definition of the beneficiary/indirect object, we said : "the beneficiary/indirect object, is the one affected in a different way than the direct object". So, now I will ask : What if there is an ambiguity, as far as the "whether the wanna-be indirect object is actually affected ?". Take this example for instance : ghawran says to a soldier : "for the klingon empire be brave !" Someone could argue that the klingon empire, isn't the beneficiary. Why ? Because it is not affected by the "being brave" of the individual warrior. If he's a coward, then that's his problem, qar'a' ? Someone else though could say that the klingon empire is honored when a warrion is brave, therefore it is to be considered the beneficiary. So, what's the case here ? If anyone knows the answer, then please endarken me.. mop Hurgh qunnoq