On 9/29/2017 1:53 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
I still don't understand..{qay'wI'} for "something that is a problem" is wrong ?
qunnoq
On Sep 29, 2017 20:50, "SuStel" <sustel@trimboli.name <mailto:sustel@trimboli.name>> wrote:
On 9/29/2017 1:42 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
ghunchu'wI': > toH. «qay'wI'» DalaDDI', nuq Dayaj?
I would understand "something that is a problem". Am I wrong ?
*vungwI'*/something that hurricanes./
No, *qay'wI'* is /something that is a problem./ But you were having trouble understanding *vungwI',* so ghunchu'wI' compared it to *qay'wI',* which you use all the time. Personally, I wouldn't use *qay'wI'* as often as you do, and wouldn't at all for /hurricane./ I wouldn't say *qay'wI' vIghaj* or *qay'wI' tu'lu';* I'd say *qay' vay'.* I WOULD use *qay'wI'* in a sentence like *qay'wI' yIngu'*/Identify the thing that is a problem./ But once that had been identified, I would at most use it as an adjectival verb: *jolvoy' qay' vItI'*/I fix the problematical transporter ionizer unit./ Klingon likes precision. It's not wrong. It's just not using Klingon in its strongest way. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name