Someone used {wa'logh neH} and I thought it was strange because {neH} is following an adverbial. While I understood it perfectly, AFAIK it can't do that, although one could argue that {wa'} is a number and hence a noun, and {neH} is modifying {wa'}, and {-logh} just happens to be tacked on to {wa'}. Would others accept it? I wondered if this question had already been asked on the mailing list, and lo and behold, I myself had asked this question in 2013: On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 at 07:23, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
We know that {neH} can follow verbs or nouns. Can it follow a number suffixed with {-logh}?
For example, {wa'logh neH qIp}. This is different than {wa'logh qIp neH}, which trivialises the hitting.
What about {ben} or other time elements, which are nouns? Would you understand {cha' ben neH qalegh}? Or does it have to be {cha' neH ben qalegh}?
The only reply at the time was Voragh, who responded with a list of canon usages of {neH}, none of which have {neH} following a number or an adverbial.
-- De'vID