19 Mar
2019
19 Mar
'19
2:13 p.m.
{cha’llogh} is not an amount, but a number of repetitions of occurrence. Twice the amount would be {cha’ boq’egh}. Perhaps: {cha’ boq’egh IH’ vighro’wIj}? Sent from my iPad
On Mar 19, 2019, at 13:57, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
This is too good to be true, but what the ghe''or, I'll write it anyway.
"my ancient cat is twice more beautiful than your ordinary cat"
{'IH vIghro'lIj motlh, 'a cha'logh 'IH vIghro'wIj tIQ}
Right ?
(say yes, say yes, say yes, say yes, say yes, say yes..)
But I *feel* many no's being loaded in torpedo tubes..
~ changan qIj _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org