26 Feb
2020
26 Feb
'20
9:07 a.m.
This isn't something I'd actually do, but I'm asking to see if my understanding is correct. Suppose I write: {qama' qIppu'bogh neH yaS'e'} This can mean "the officer who has merely hit the prisoner", but it can also mean "the officer who has hit only the prisoner". Right ? Of course, we could just place the {neH} right after the {qama'} and eliminate the ambiguity.. But I'm just trying to understand how things work. ~ mayqel qunen'oS