On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:11 AM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, this is awkward. I want to edit this entry to include the new information, but if I do, then it won't be the text that Marc Okrand referred to any more.
For posterity, here is what it currently says: "This noun indicates that a single thing is being considered apart from others, or that a sequence of identical things is considered one after another. Like {Hoch} and {'op}, it precedes what it modifies."
(The printed qepHom booklet actually includes a screenshot of this text next to Okrand's reference to it, so it's preserved there as well.)
Maybe you can include the original text of the entry in the optional note section where puns and the like go, along with a mention that Okrand thought that text was pretty good. Also, it's good to have this clarified, even though it turned out pretty much like we thought. Thanks again, Lieven and MO and Maltz!