Am 19.11.2021 um 15:58 schrieb SuStel:
I don't think we have a definitive answer to this question. Personally, I have no problem with *'op ngop* meaning exactly what you say. I believe we do know that you can use numbers with inherently plural nouns, so I see no reason you can't use number-like nouns in the same way.
I agree. A point that slightly confirms the usage of {'op} like a number is that Maltz recently confirmed that it's okay to say {'oplogh} and {'opDIch}.
2. If I want to say*She hasn't sold it*, I can say *ngevpu'be'*. What would *ngevta'be'* mean? That she set out to sell it, but she didn't accomplished it? Has *-ta'be'* always the meaning of failing? Or can we also use it just to negate that an action took place?
I wouldn't be so strict here. There's a canon sentence that comes to my mind {vIta'pu'be'} "I didn't do it", but that does no help here, as it doesn't use the {-ta'} suffix. Using {-ta'be'} does not brig a negative connotation of failing to me. You could also not sell something with intention. "My father wanted to sell his car yesterday; but he changed his mind, he did not sell it." I'd use {ngevta'be'} here. -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" http://www.tlhInganHol.com http://klingon.wiki/En/AliceInWonderland